Fylfathic: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|name=Fylfathic | |name=Fylfathic | ||
|altname=Lojic | |altname=Lojic | ||
|nativename={{lang|fulf| | |nativename={{lang|fulf|تٖنگَفٖلفَنص، تٖنگَلٓجَا}} | ||
|pronunciation=tyŋ.ga.fyl.fant͡s, tyŋ.ga.lo.d͡ʒaʔ | |pronunciation=tyŋ.ga.fyl.fant͡s, tyŋ.ga.lo.d͡ʒaʔ | ||
|ethnicity=[[Fylfans]] | |ethnicity=[[Fylfans]] | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|script1=Arab | |script1=Arab | ||
|ancestor1=[[Proto-Chlesamnic]] | |ancestor1=[[Proto-Chlesamnic]] | ||
|ancestor2={{PAGENAME}} | |ancestor2=[[Old Fylfathic]] | ||
|ancestor3={{PAGENAME}} | |||
|creator=[[User:Melinoë|Melinoë]] | |creator=[[User:Melinoë|Melinoë]] | ||
|created=June 13th, 2026 | |created=June 13th, 2026 | ||
| Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
==Etymology== | ==Etymology== | ||
{{l|fulf|تُنگَفٖلفَنص|tr=tüngafülfanṣ}} descends from | {{l|fulf|تُنگَفٖلفَنص|tr=tüngafülfanṣ}} descends from Old Fylfathic {{l|oflf|تيُنگافيُلفانص|tr=tüngafülfanṣ}}, itself a reformation of the ancient "فيُلفانآثاتيُنگا" ''(fülfanoṯatünga)'', all ultimately compounds of modern {{l|fulf|فٖلفَنص|tr=fülfanṣ|t=Fylfans}} + {{l|fulf|تٖنَگ|tr=tünag|t=tongue}}. | ||
The {{l|fulf|لٓجَا|ـلٓجَا|tr=-lojaʔ}} of {{l|fulf|تٖنگَلٓجَا|tr=tüngalojaʔ}} is from {{lang|fulf|لٓجَا}} {{lang|fulf|lojaʔ}}, the word for a blinding white, though it is taken as a shortening of the name of Mount Lebanon. | The {{l|fulf|لٓجَا|ـلٓجَا|tr=-lojaʔ}} of {{l|fulf|تٖنگَلٓجَا|tr=tüngalojaʔ}} is from {{lang|fulf|لٓجَا}} ({{lang|fulf|lojaʔ}}), the word for a blinding white, though it is taken as a shortening of the name of Mount Lebanon. | ||
==Morphology== | ==Morphology== | ||
Fylfathic is among the most divergent of all the Chlesamnic languages, and this shows in its strongly nonconcatenative morphology that works off roots as in the Semitic languages. | Fylfathic is among the most divergent of all the Chlesamnic languages, and this shows in its strongly nonconcatenative morphology that works off roots as in the Semitic languages. | ||
===Nouns=== | ===Nouns=== | ||
Nouns have | Nouns have, at most, four patterns, all of these work on the root pattern "(CV)CVC", the first vowel can be anything, but the second vowel is limited to the small set of /a, i, aj, aw/ in the singular, and /aw, aj, a, a.wa/ in the plural. These different patterns recieve the names "-a- root", "-i- root", -ay- root", and "-aw- root", an example of each is {{l|fulf|فٖلَف|tr=fülaf}}, {{l|fulf|عَفِا|tr=ʕafiʔ}}, {{l|fulf|فٔذَير|tr=feḏayr}}, and {{l|fulf|مَينَوص|tr=maynawṣ}}. | ||
{{inflection-table-top|title=a-stem, masc|tall=y|palette=green}} | {{inflection-table-top|title=a-stem, masc|tall=y|palette=green}} | ||
| Line 49: | Line 51: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! indefinite | ! indefinite | ||
| فٖلَف<br/><span style="color:grey">fülaf</span> | | {{lang|fulf|فٖلَف}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|fülaf}}</span> | ||
| فٖلَوف<br/><span style="color:grey">fülawf</span> | | {{lang|fulf|فٖلَوف}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|fülawf}}</span> | ||
| | | {{lang|fulf|}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|}}</span> | ||
| | | {{lang|fulf|}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|}}</span> | ||
| | | {{lang|fulf|}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|}}</span> | ||
| | | {{lang|fulf|}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|}}</span> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! definite | ! definite | ||
| اَلـفٖلَف<br/><span style="color:grey">al-fülaf</span> | | {{lang|fulf|اَلـفٖلَف}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|al-fülaf}}</span> | ||
| اَلـفٖلَوف<br/><span style="color:grey">al-fülawf</span> | | {{lang|fulf|اَلـفٖلَوف}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|al-fülawf}}</span> | ||
| | | {{lang|fulf|}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|}}</span> | ||
| | | {{lang|fulf|}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|}}</span> | ||
| | | {{lang|fulf|}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|}}</span> | ||
| | | {{lang|fulf|}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|}}</span> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! construct | ! construct | ||
| فٖلفَـ<br/><span style="color:grey">fülfa-</span> | | {{lang|fulf|فٖلفَـ}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|fülfa-}}</span> | ||
| فٖلفَوـ<br/><span style="color:grey">fülfaw-</span> | | {{lang|fulf|فٖلفَوـ}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|fülfaw-}}</span> | ||
| | | {{lang|fulf|}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|}}</span> | ||
| | | {{lang|fulf|}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|}}</span> | ||
| | | {{lang|fulf|}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|}}</span> | ||
| | | {{lang|fulf|}}<br/><span style="color:grey">{{lang|fulf|}}</span> | ||
{{inflection-table-bottom}} | {{inflection-table-bottom}} | ||
As can be seen, Fylfathic borrows "al-" from Arabic but writes it differently, with an obligatory kashida (eg. "اَلـ"), the origonal purpose was not recorded, but it is likely to make the division clearer. You will also notice a construct form, this descends from the "short genitive" (the form used in compounding), and this shift had been happening since at least the early 12th century and can be seen in the clear shift in how compounds are formed, for example, we will take "mountain", which is literally "that which carves the sky" in Fylfathic. Before the shift, such a compound would be formed as "sky's carver", with "sky" in the short genitive, thus the ancient "{{lang|fulf|ammaskafanṣ}}", but after the shift we see the form {{l| | As can be seen, Fylfathic borrows "al-" from Arabic but writes it differently, with an obligatory kashida (eg. "اَلـ"), the origonal purpose was not recorded, but it is likely to make the division clearer. You will also notice a construct form, this descends from the "short genitive" (the form used in compounding), and this shift had been happening since at least the early 12th century and can be seen in the clear shift in how compounds are formed, for example, we will take "mountain", which is literally "that which carves the sky" in Fylfathic. Before the shift, such a compound would be formed as "sky's carver", with "sky" in the short genitive, thus the ancient "{{lang|fulf|ammaskafanṣ}}", but after the shift we see the form {{l|oflf|سکافانآثاامّاس|tr=skafanōṯaammas}} (modern: {{l|fulf|خَفَنَوثَمَم|tr=hafanawṯamam}}) | ||
===Adjectives=== | ===Adjectives=== | ||
===Pronouns=== | ===Pronouns=== | ||
===Verbs=== | ===Verbs=== | ||
==Syntax== | |||
==Texts== | |||
==Vocabulary== | |||
Latest revision as of 05:35, 21 June 2026
 | This article is private. The author requests that you do not make changes to this project without approval. By all means, please help fix spelling, grammar and organisation problems, thank you. |
| Fylfathic | |
|---|---|
| Lojic | |
| تٖنگَفٖلفَنص، تٖنگَلٓجَا | |
| Pronunciation | [tyŋ.ga.fyl.fant͡s, tyŋ.ga.lo.d͡ʒaʔ] |
| Created by | Melinoë |
| Date | June 13th, 2026 |
| Native to | Lebanon |
| Ethnicity | Fylfans |
Indo-European
| |
Early forms | Proto-Chlesamnic
|
| Official status | |
Recognised minority language in | Lebanon |
| Language codes | |
| ISO 639-3 | fulf |
Fylfathic (/ˈfʊl.feɪ̯.ðɪk/, /ˈfʌl.feɪ̯.ðɪk/, or (rare) /ˈfɪl.feɪ̯.ðɪk/, also "Lojic" /loʊ̯.d͡ʒɪk/; Autonym: تُنگَفٖلفَنص (tüngafülfanṣ) /tyŋ.ga.fyl.fant͡s/ or تٖنگَلٓجَا (tüngalojaʔ) /tyŋ.ga.lo.d͡ʒaʔ/) is a Chlesamnic language spoken on the northeast side of Mount Lebanon (Native: خَفَنَوثَلٓجَا (hafanawṯalojaʔ)).
Etymology
تُنگَفٖلفَنص (tüngafülfanṣ) descends from Old Fylfathic تيُنگافيُلفانص (tüngafülfanṣ), itself a reformation of the ancient "فيُلفانآثاتيُنگا" (fülfanoṯatünga), all ultimately compounds of modern فٖلفَنص (fülfanṣ, “Fylfans”) + تٖنَگ (tünag, “tongue”).
The ـلٓجَا (-lojaʔ) of تٖنگَلٓجَا (tüngalojaʔ) is from لٓجَا (lojaʔ), the word for a blinding white, though it is taken as a shortening of the name of Mount Lebanon.
Morphology
Fylfathic is among the most divergent of all the Chlesamnic languages, and this shows in its strongly nonconcatenative morphology that works off roots as in the Semitic languages.
Nouns
Nouns have, at most, four patterns, all of these work on the root pattern "(CV)CVC", the first vowel can be anything, but the second vowel is limited to the small set of /a, i, aj, aw/ in the singular, and /aw, aj, a, a.wa/ in the plural. These different patterns recieve the names "-a- root", "-i- root", -ay- root", and "-aw- root", an example of each is فٖلَف (fülaf), عَفِا (ʕafiʔ), فٔذَير (feḏayr), and مَينَوص (maynawṣ).
| فٖلَف (fülaf) | [Term?] () | [Term?] () | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| singular | plural | singular | plural | singular | plural | |
| indefinite | فٖلَف fülaf |
فٖلَوف fülawf |
||||
| definite | اَلـفٖلَف al-fülaf |
اَلـفٖلَوف al-fülawf |
||||
| construct | فٖلفَـ fülfa- |
فٖلفَوـ fülfaw- |
||||
As can be seen, Fylfathic borrows "al-" from Arabic but writes it differently, with an obligatory kashida (eg. "اَلـ"), the origonal purpose was not recorded, but it is likely to make the division clearer. You will also notice a construct form, this descends from the "short genitive" (the form used in compounding), and this shift had been happening since at least the early 12th century and can be seen in the clear shift in how compounds are formed, for example, we will take "mountain", which is literally "that which carves the sky" in Fylfathic. Before the shift, such a compound would be formed as "sky's carver", with "sky" in the short genitive, thus the ancient "ammaskafanṣ", but after the shift we see the form سکافانآثاامّاس (skafanōṯaammas) (modern: خَفَنَوثَمَم (hafanawṯamam))