Verse:Tdūrzů/Knench/Ancient: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
| 𐤎𐤅𐤎𐤅𐤕 ''susoδ'' <br/> /ˈsusoð/ | | 𐤎𐤅𐤎𐤅𐤕 ''susoδ'' <br/> /ˈsusoð/ | ||
|} | |} | ||
Possessive suffixes were as follows: | |||
*1sg: ''sus'''i''''' 'my horse', pl. ''sus'''áy''''' 'my horses' | |||
*2sg.m: ''sus'''aγ''''', pl. ''sus'''eγa''''' | |||
*2sg.f: ''sus'''eγ''''', pl. '''suseγe''''' | |||
*3sg.m: ''sus'''o''''', pl. ''sus'''ayo''''' | |||
*3sg.f: ''sus'''ā''''', pl. ''sus'''ayā''''' | |||
*1pl: ''sus'''anu''''', pl. ''sus'''aynu''''' | |||
*2pl: ''sus'''xem/n''', pl. ''sus'''ayγem/n''' (-m for masculine, -n for feminine) | |||
*3pl: ''sus'''am/n''', pl. ''susēm/n''' (-m for masculine, -n for feminine) | |||
===Adjectives=== | ===Adjectives=== | ||
Revision as of 17:39, 10 October 2019
| Druidic Canaanite | |
|---|---|
| 𐤊𐤍𐤏𐤍𐤉𐤕 | |
| Pronunciation | [/xənaɣ̃ˈniːð/] |
| Created by | IlL |
| Setting | Lõis |
Afro-Asiatic
| |
Druidic Canaanite (natively 𐤀𐤋𐤔𐤅𐤍 𐤀𐤊𐤍𐤏𐤍𐤉𐤕 ʔal-lašón ʔaχ-χanaȝníδ /ʔallaˈʃon ʔaxxanaɣ̃ˈniːð/) is the stage of Xnánið between the split from Pre-Exilic Biblical Hebrew ca. 6th century BC and ca. 5th century CE. It was used as a literary language during this period and was the liturgical language of Near-East druidism before the religion was supplanted by Henosis Ousias. It was then that the drastic changes that had occurred in the spoken language began to be reflected in writing, thus ushering in the era of modern Xnánið.
Druidic Canaanite developed in isolation from Jewish Hebrew in Cyprus and was influenced by Cypriot Celtic. It is a separate lineage from the Post-Exilic Jewish reading traditions that eventually gave rise to Tiberian Hebrew and the modern Jewish reading traditions.
Todo
- Long and overlong vowels?
- When should matres lectionis be used?
Phonology
Orthography
Druidic Canaanite was written in an abjad descended from the Proto-Hebrew script. Religious texts were vocalized but not completely, hence it is reconstructed on the basis of Modern Canaanite and Tiberian Hebrew.
Consonants
Out of the 25 consonants of Pre-Exilic Biblical Hebrew, Druidic Canaanite merged:
- /x/ with /ħ/ into /ħ/
- /ɬ/ with /t/ (taw) into /θ/
- /ʕ/ and /ɣ/ into /ɣ̃/
- /h/ and /ʔ/ into /ʔ/ ([h] was an allophone used for emphasis.)
/m p b f v n t d th θ ð ts~dz s tsʰ ʃ ɣ̃ ħ k g kh x ɣ l w j r/ ⟨m p b f v n t d ᴛ θ δ z s c š ȝ ħ k g ᴋ χ γ l w y r⟩
/l/ allophonically velarized before C.
Mutations
Words can undergo initial mutation but the mutations are different from the begadkefat spirantization in Tiberian Hebrew. The following mutations occur after a vowel:
- beth /p/ → /b/
- pe /f/ → /v/
- daleth /t/ → /d/
- taw /θ/ → /ð/
- gimel /k/ → /g/
- kaph /x/ → /ɣ/
- zayin /ts/ → /dz/
- samekh/sin /s/ → /z/
Vowels
a e i o u á é í ó ú /a e i o u a: e: i: o: u:/
Long vowels were a result of dropped aleph and he.
Prosody
Stress
Stress was penultimate for most words.
Intonation
Morphophonology
Grammar
Still basically Hebrew (except with penultimate stress), with inflected verbs.
Syntax was retained as VSO under the influence of Celtic.
Pronouns
Independent
- 1sg: ʔáni
- 2sg: ʔátta (m), ʔátte (f)
- 3sg: ʔū (m), ʔī (f)
- 1pl: ʔáħnu, náħnu
- 2pl: ʔattémma (m), ʔatténna (f)
- 3pl: ʔémma (m), ʔénna (f)
Nouns
Inflection
The definite article was ʔaC- (from Biblical Hebrew *haC-). It caused gemination of the following consonant; if the following consonant was a guttural and thus could not geminate, it was lengthened to ʔā-.
The Biblical feminine singular ending *-ā́ became unstressed -a, and the stress in feminine singular nouns in -a shifted to penultimate (by analogy with masculine singular adjectives and 3fs perfect verbs). Other possible feminine endings are -t, -θ or -δ. Eventually stress shifted away from gender/number suffixes across the board: The regular masculine and feminine plural endings were unstressed -im and unstressed -oδ, from Biblical Hebrew *-ī́m and *-ṓt.
Sometimes -a is found where Standard Jewish Hebrew has -t, and vice versa.
The construct state was not entirely predictable but not as "hard" as Tiberian Hebrew. Feminine singular nouns in -a had a construct state in -aδ.
Example with sus 'horse' and susa 'female horse':
| number | singular | plural | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| gender | m. | f. | m. | f. |
| indef. | 𐤎𐤅𐤎 sus /sus/ |
𐤎𐤅𐤎𐤀 susa /ˈsusa/ |
𐤎𐤅𐤎𐤉𐤌 susim /ˈsusim/ |
𐤎𐤅𐤎𐤅𐤕 susoδ /ˈsusoð/ |
| def. | 𐤀𐤎𐤅𐤎 ʔas-sus /ʔassus/ |
𐤀𐤎𐤅𐤎𐤀 ʔas-susa /ʔasˈsusa/ |
𐤀𐤎𐤅𐤎𐤉𐤌 ʔas-susim /ʔasˈsusim/ |
𐤀𐤎𐤅𐤎𐤅𐤕 ʔas-susoδ /ʔasˈsusoð/ |
| const. | 𐤎𐤅𐤎 sus /sus/ |
𐤎𐤅𐤎𐤕 susaδ /ˈsusað/ |
𐤎𐤅𐤎𐤉 suse /ˈsuse/ |
𐤎𐤅𐤎𐤅𐤕 susoδ /ˈsusoð/ |
Possessive suffixes were as follows:
- 1sg: susi 'my horse', pl. susáy 'my horses'
- 2sg.m: susaγ, pl. suseγa
- 2sg.f: suseγ, pl. suseγe
- 3sg.m: suso, pl. susayo
- 3sg.f: susā, pl. susayā
- 1pl: susanu, pl. susaynu
- 2pl: susxem/n, pl. susayγem/n (-m for masculine, -n for feminine)
- 3pl: susam/n, pl. susēm/n (-m for masculine, -n for feminine)
Adjectives
The most common way to express 'very, extreme(ly), great(ly)' was to use the prefix ro- (borrowed from Proto-Celtic *ɸro-; cognate to Irish ró-, Welsh rhy, both 'too, excessively'). At first only adjectives could take this prefix, but later it was also used on nouns.
Verbs
All 7 binyanim of Biblical Hebrew were in use.
Verbs inherited the following forms from Biblical Hebrew:
- Past/Perfect/Stative (from the BH perfect)
- Non-past/Imperfect (from the BH imperfect)
- Energic nun for emphasis or wishes
- Imperative
- Infinitive construct
- Infinitive absolute
- Participle
The Biblical Hebrew waw-consecutive and jussive forms were lost.
Derivation
Mishkalim
Todo: new Druidic Hebrew mishkalim
- masculine segolates: CaCəC, CiCəC, CuCəC
- feminine segolates: CaCCa, CiCCa, CuCCa
- CaCaCa
- CaCuCa
Sample texts
Lexicon
ʔ
- ʔilṓ (pl. ʔilóʔim) = an animistic spirit, like a Japanese kami
- ʔəšéra = tree as a spiritual object
n
- n-ᴛ-f
- níᴛfa = spiritual intuition or inspiration (from a root meaning 'dropping, prophecy' in BH)
ȝ
- ȝarába = willow
r
- rimmón = pomegranate